Pathak Commission questions Jagat
Pathak Commission questions Jagat
Jagat Singh on Tuesday appeared before the Pathak Commission on his alleged role in the oil-for-food scam.

New Delhi: Jagat Singh, son of former External Affairs Minister Natwar Singh, on Tuesday appeared before the Pathak Commission on his alleged role in the oil-for-food scam.

"They asked me about my visit to Iraq, and what my interests over there were," he said.

Jagat said he had supplied whatever information he had to the one-man Authority, which is examining Jagat's role in the alleged scam in which Natwar Singh and Congress party have been named as non-contractual beneficiaries.

He said the examination was based on documentary evidence gathered over several months by Government's Special Envoy Virendra Dayal and other investigative agencies. They are probing allegations into the Indian angle in Iraq's oil-for-food programme scam.

Asked whether he was in support of further extension of the tenure of the Authority, Jagat said he wished that the truth behind these allegations would be uncovered as soon as possible.

"Only those who are guilty would want a delay in this matter. My father and I have nothing to hide and we definitely hope that the probe will end soon," he said.

When asked to compare this examination with that conducted by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) some time ago, Jagat said this (the Pathak Inquiry) covered all the points, and was a very thorough examination.

During the hearings before the Authority, Andaleeb Sehgal and Aditya Khanna had admitted that Jagat and his father were non-contractual beneficiaries in the alleged scam. However, Jagat had denied any involvement in the issue.

In his reply to a notice by the Authority, Jagat had maintained that he had given details of his bank accounts, income tax returns and business to the Authority and if it so wished, it could get other details submitted to the ED.

What's your reaction?

Comments

https://wapozavr.com/assets/images/user-avatar-s.jpg

0 comment

Write the first comment for this!