views
Social media is a vast treasure trove of content, ranging from entertaining to informative. Among these, pictures related to riddles and optical illusions often go viral. Recently, a tricky question has taken social media by storm, attracting significant public attention.
In the viral video, a man poses a riddle to two women, asking, “What is one thing that can be seen but cannot be touched?” The two women, clearly puzzled, exchange glances as they try to guess the answer. The man then involves another random person to join in and answer the question. One of the women confidently answers, “Our hair,” which can be seen but not touched. However, the man corrects her, saying it’s the wrong answer. She tries again, guessing “air,” but fails once more. The man then turns to the other woman, and both of them burst into laughter. From the video, it’s evident that despite their best efforts, neither of them managed to get the right answer. Though the video concludes without revealing the correct answer, viewers flooded the comment section with their guesses.
The video was posted by a content creator named Raj, who has a following of over 2 lakh. From his profile, it’s clear that he frequently creates such videos where he asks random tricky questions to people and racks up views. This particular video, captioned “What is something that you cannot touch but can see?” garnered 163,000 views. Many people shared their thoughts in the comment section.
Users suggested a variety of answers. One commented that the correct answer was the sun, while another guessed it to be a shadow. Someone else proposed that the answer might be dreams, and another user humorously suggested that the answer is the internet.
Many users provided the correct answer in the comment section. According to most, the correct answer is a shadow, while others believe it’s light. Both answers seem valid, as both light and shadow are visible yet intangible. Although we can place our hands on them, it doesn’t count as truly touching or holding them.
Comments
0 comment